Place Your Advertisement Here
All ad revenues support the mission of the Epilepsy Therapy Project
 
UPDATED: Sun, 10/21/2007 - 9:37pm

  • Insights & Strategies
  • Seizure Medication
  • Videos
  • Seizure Diary
  • Find a Doctor
  • Epilepsy Centers
  • Clinical Trials
  • Event Calendar

Place Your Advertisement Here
All ad revenues support the mission
of the Epilepsy Therapy Project

Determining the right to know

The law on medical negligence in the UK relies heavily on the Bolam test whereby a doctor is not negligent (i.e. does not breach the legal standard of care) where their practice is supported by a reasonable body of similar professionals. The test has been applied to the provision of information to patients as well as in diagnosis and treatment. Further, following the Bolitho case, any practice must also be justifiable on a logical basis and doctors must have considered the risks and benefits of competing options. Logical justification of any medical practice must reflect any advances in medical knowledge rather than a residual adherence to out–of-date ideas. Thus, the Court may test the medical evidence offered by parties in litigation in order to reach its own conclusions. It may consider not only the magnitude of risk, but also the seriousness of the consequences, the ease by which the risk might be avoided, the resource implications of such avoidance, and the risk of alternative interventions.

Regarding SUDEP, while a small number of medical practitioners appear to oppose the provision of any information on risk, there is a sizeable body of practitioners who believe the contrary. Whether that small number who oppose the provision of information can now be regarded as a reasonable body of opinion is debateable and would be a matter of evidence before the court in a damages claim for medical negligence. The court would be entitled to consider the available knowledge base on SUDEP and in particular on the nature of risk. In the UK, the finding of the National Sentinel Clinical Audit of Epilepsy-Related Death (Hanna 2002) that SUDEP is causally related to continuing seizures (of a variety of types) may constitute strong evidence that SUDEP is potentially preventable insofar as continuing seizures are often amenable to intervention. In addition, there is an extant literature on possible risk categories, precautions and interventions, which also suggests the possibility of precautions and interventions to avoid SUDEP. The court would also consider the potential seriousness of the consequences of not informing a patient of risk which, in the case of SUDEP, is likely to be an influential factor.

In addition, any failure by doctors to provide information on the risks of epilepsy death may be incompatible with human rights protections. Existing rights to life and to family life protections, as well as prohibitions on degrading treatment (such as treatment without informed consent), are likely to impact on any assessment of the appropriateness of medical practice. Such a failure is clearly incompatible with existing clinical guidelines on the management of epilepsy such as the NICE guidelines in England and Wales (2004) and the SIGN guidelines in Scotland (2003), both of which categorise information on SUDEP as an essential element of information provision. The increasing number and importance of clinical guidelines assist the Court in assessing what amounts to a reasonable standard of care.

Given that there has been only one judicial determination in the UK relating to SUDEP, it is prudent to consider the approach taken by the court in that case to the issue of information provision. The determination issued by Sheriff Taylor in 2002 in the Fatal Accident Inquiry into the death of 17 year old Colette Findlay provides clear guidance for doctors on this matter (Taylor 2002). The court accepted evidence that SUDEP was a real risk for individuals whose seizures were not fully controlled. The determination acknowledged that precautions can be taken to minimise this risk. These precautions include controlling the seizures, altering sleeping arrangements, and using alarms. Providing such information was viewed as a reasonable precaution to prevent death. Consequently, Sheriff Taylor determined that in the vast majority of cases patients and/or their families should be told about the risk of SUDEP.

Given this determination, doctors would be well advised in almost every circumstance to advise patients and their families about risk and give information on possible precautions. Indeed, it is arguable that the case for providing information on risk has been strengthened since this court heard its evidence by the findings of the National Sentinel Clinical Audit of Epilepsy-Related Deaths (Hanna 2002).

It is worth stressing the distinction between legal and medical definitions of proof – civil courts will assess evidence on a balance of probabilities rather than scientific certainty. The court will assess whether on a balance of probabilities there was a departure from the standard of reasonable care and whether a death would have been avoided. In the absence of information on risk, individuals and their families lose the chance to take potentially preventative measures. As Sheriff Taylor (2002) noted:

“The risks of sudden death in epilepsy should have been explained to them. There should have been a discussion as to how Colette’s condition might be managed. Issues such as apnoea alarms to detect any cessation of breathing, sleeping in the company of another adult and other similar measures should have been discussed. I accept that there are pros and cons about taking such measures, but there ought to have been an informed discussion. If such measures were not to be taken, then it should have been a deliberate, conscious decision as opposed to a decision by default”.

It is sometimes argued that a doctor’s duty of care requires open and frank discussion of SUDEP with patients who seek information. However, to rely on patients seeking information on risk is an illogical (if commonly held) position – it requires that patients know about risk in order to raise the issue. While some individuals wish to know very little information about risk, they should be offered information and its decline recorded, albeit that opportunity must be provided to revisit the issue where their wishes change. Additional speculation on this matter might look to the potential liability for harm to carers who suffer the shock and trauma of losing a loved one to SUDEP.

In any event, the strongest argument for the provision of information on the risk of SUDEP may well be a moral one in terms of rights to information or one based on good medical practice in empowering patients to deal with risk. Doctors should, however, be mindful of the real possibility of legal liability.

Robert Carr,
Solicitor-Advocate at Anderson Strathern and a Law Society of Scotland
Accredited Specialist in Medical Negligence and Personal Injury Litigation


Reprinted with the permission of Epilepsy Australia-the national coalition of Australia epilepsy associations and Epilepsy Bereaved UK.


Welcome to the Wiki. This space is created for epilepsy.com members to share their own experiences and expertise to help refine and expand the discussion around important topics.

No members have yet contributed to this topic. If you are not yet an epilepsy.com member, register today to get started on this Wiki topic and the many other advantages of being a member. If you are a member and wish to be the first to edit this Wiki topic, please make sure to login, then click on the orange "Start Wiki" button at the top of this page. Or, learn more about Wikis.


Take Control of your seizures by starting My Epilepsy Diary today.

Keeping a daily record of your seizures can help you and your doctor better understand and treat your epilepsy.

Open my epiCom Diary


Title Posted
Faked seizures  
dfarrell
I Have Epilepsy and I Hate My Life...  
1nevermore
terrified to get pregnant  
linzysmith323
Food-Triggered Siezures  
uberzwitter
The Reasons not to consume alcohol or smoke marijuana if you have epilepsy  
LaurenG1211
Can exercise induce seizures?  
MichaelK
Do seizures change characteristics over time?  
Amazon
Epilepsy triggers?  
Black.Pearl
Can your body build up a resistance to a medication?  
KellyS
Normal EEG but continuing seizures  
Amazon
View all Forums

Title Posted
Does Epilepsy Get Worse With Aging?  
tara michelucci
Anyone with appetite increase or weight gain while getting on Lamictal?  
catamenialgirl
excessive weight gain on Epilim- need advice in regards to the two alternatives to switch to???  
justinedc
Seizures During Sleep  
Morning Sunshine
2 year old hates taking med - Ideas??  
Blaine
Hysterectomy reduce seizures??  
Shakey Mom
Keppra  
clfcsparrow
how to get the glue out of your hair  
rootbeergirl16
Seizure Meds & Work?  
GodivaGirl
Anyone experience memory loss?  
tiff_25
View all Forums

Title Page Views
my.epilepsy.com Updates  
epi_help
topamax and weight loss  
alexia mom
kepra  
brian mattingly
Possible cure for absence seizures  
pdl1
Epilepsy and marijuana  
cjad234
Sexual Side Effects  
George R
How exactly do aura's feel  
WendyBendy
MEDICAL ALERT I.D.'s  
picnupthepcs
Over 40 Different Types Of Seizures - Revised  
spiz
electrical shock in head?  
Maggie
View all Forums

Title Posted
BEEN A LONG.........PROBABLY A LONG PURGING BLOG COMING........I'M BEING FOLLOWED BY A MOONSHADOW....  
ROCKNROLL
AS THE DRUG COMPANY TURNS - THE SOAP OPERA  
banffgirl
Changing seizures..very scary  
r_mommy2
Quitting medication after brain operation  
karl34
My friend...  
Crystal11
Im new and could use as much advice as possible!!!  
brookehaye
Student Life and Epilepsy  
How enlightening  
megfrito
Weird huh?  
Jensey84
Normal?  
Jensey84
View all Blogs

Title Posted
Diabetes and Epilepsy  
Sugerfree
We won!  
chandagunn
MOV to MP4 for Zune  
echoChristina
How to convert FLV videos for Apple TV?  
sally2010
New vs Secondhand Vans  
linhongzi
Professional Clogs in the Medical Field  
wulidan
I need some HELP! PLEASE READ  
Senior_10
Meds  
cait888
Jillian's Progress  
jillsmom
My memory, mental function's been badly affected. Is it the medication, or the fits?  
Gubs
View all Blogs

Title Page Views
Inspirational Quote - My Own Personal Inner Thoughts  
Butterflygrl
my partial complex seizures  
Zanna1211
Topomax... The Dreaded.........  
Dr Jason
Brain Zaps, tics & twitches  
JudiS
side effects of phenobarb.  
pksmom
Feeling Sick  
JBJ1984
How can you tell if a sleep seizure happens?  
epl_controller
Tegretol XR and ANXIETY meds  
Butterflygrl
TYLENOL, AEDs & SEIZURES  
cmscribbles
Nonepileptic "Events" vs. "Seizures"  
teft
View all Blogs

Title Posted
giving humans another try ;)  
bookworm03
growning up  
geenie
Journey of Epilepsy  
Jensey84
Our son Shawn Orkis.  
Ron. Orkis
Epilepsy and my daughter  
dmeitzen
Fighting the fight to stop the seizures  
lahull2000
Isolated Seizures, Don't feel the need for Meds...  
luli18
My Life With Epilepsy  
DUMFY
My seizures  
ladybugg31186
My Story  
CN
View all Stories

Title Posted
Help me  
Senior_10
My Son Has Seizures  
KimandLannie
Nathan  
shamm
Choosing Your Perfect Dishwasher  
linhongzi
MBT shoes and foot health of any contact  
zxq2012
I am a worried Morther  
spades
Army Gifts Lift Our Soldiers’ Spirits  
bobo0
Never Grew Out of It!  
fhsu_recruiter
Sophies Story- Infantile Spasms  
sophiesmummy
MIGUEL'S STORY  
miguelitos mom
View all Stories

Place Your Advertisement Here
All ad revenues support the mission
of the Epilepsy Therapy Project