Community Forum Archive
The Epilepsy Community Forums are closed, and the information is archived. The content in this section may not be current or apply to all situations. In addition, forum questions and responses include information and content that has been generated by epilepsy community members. This content is not moderated. The information on these pages should not be substituted for medical advice from a healthcare provider. Experiences with epilepsy can vary greatly on an individual basis. Please contact your doctor or medical team if you have any questions about your situation. For more information, learn about epilepsy or visit our resources section.
question..
Sat, 06/11/2011 - 07:30Comments
Re: question..
Submitted by Spike. on Mon, 2011-06-13 - 21:04
Tadzio, I became aware of the seizure and epilepsies reclassification proposal (2009), but never found any information about anything actually getting renamed or reclassified. Have you discovered any information about any recent renaming or reclassifications for seizures and or epilepsies?
Bruce (I'm not a doctor, but instead, an epilepsy support group leader, epilepsy advocate, who has epilepsy.)
Tadzio, I became aware of the seizure and epilepsies reclassification proposal (2009), but never found any information about anything actually getting renamed or reclassified. Have you discovered any information about any recent renaming or reclassifications for seizures and or epilepsies?
Bruce (I'm not a doctor, but instead, an epilepsy support group leader, epilepsy advocate, who has epilepsy.)
Re: question..
Submitted by 3Hours2Live on Mon, 2011-06-13 - 19:29
There's been a recent classification reorganization and change for classifications, but if you mean "Can a primary generalized seizure directly induce a simple partial seizure and/or a partial complex seizure?", I think the current orthodox answer is "No". Certainly, the physical results from a severe generalized seizure can cause physical damage that later results in another form of epilepsy that includes partial seizures (an example could be differential blood flows resulting in an isolated partial seizure nearly concurrent, but still "after" the primary generalized seizure). Epileptic "kindling" is mainly observed, or hypothecated, as "spreading out" from a smaller area, instead of "concentrating to" a smaller area. Electroconvulsive Theraphy's (ECT) seemingly coming back into vogue might have biased the latest popular research, but ECT induces generalized seizures as treatments for what-not, and ECT is currently strongly defended as NOT leading to greater likelihood for the development of any forms of epilepsy (IMO, I would suspect words like "directly" as being exploited (for example, ECT can cause death, and near death experiences CAN cause epilepsy)). ECT is sometimes even touted as a treatment for minimizing epilepsy!!! A defensive pro-ECT article is: http://www.seizure-journal.com/article/PIIS105913110600224X/fulltext Older research cites 300% to 3600% increased incidence of an epileptic seizure with ECT: http://books.google.com/books?id=lFNrR7PZ4qYC&pg=PA88&dq=epilepsy+ect&hl=en&ei=_nb0Ta2YKIqasAObx5yuCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=ect%20Devinsky%201.8&f=false But on the very small scale: "These findings strongly suggest that activation of the Fyn signaling pathway is involved in hippocampus-dependent formation of contextual fear memory." and, "This implicates a Fyn-dependent biochemical pathway in the induction but not the maintenance of normal amygdala kindling. fyn is the first gene identified to be required for normal epileptogenesis." From: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18691323 and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8777897 "Contextual Fear" seems related to aspects of ECT, requiring other additional "treatments". The "divergent unidirection" of kindling is probably just a confussion from the difference of magnitude based on direction of the kindling "Afferent Nerve Fibers" versus "Efferent Nerve Fibers" posits parts of bidirectional kindling, including from larger areas to smaller areas. A medium for a multidirectional area raises doubt about the orthodox view of kindling only from small to large, and not from large to small. "Susceptibility to Kindling and Neuronal Connections of the Anterior Claustrum" http://www.jneurosci.org/content/21/10/3674.full.pdf cites afferent versus efferent, and the book "Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsies: clinical, experimental, and genetic aspects" by Alain Malafosse (1994), somewhat illustrate the "occult" unknown nature of primary generalized seizures, which necessarily must have a right-and-left connected start. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=OIclTblRPf4C&oi=fnd&pg=PA349&dq=Anterior+Claustrum+generalized+seizures&ots=FtgNSmyhfp&sig=cQnxKgFertVpocfUWGX7HAiakfM#v=onepage&q=Anterior%20Claustrum%20generalized%20seizures&f=false (Sometimes, somewhat still bizarre links to quantum mechanics are made for a "dis-connected" cause). The nonlinear theory of dynamics apllied to the notion that a "seizure begets a seizure" until a cusp is reached where a "seizure prevents a seizure" sparked a brief fad of neurological catastrophe theory, but the opinion pendulum is presently more at the "a seizure prevents a seizure". Still, "Seizures Beget Seizures: A Lack of Experimental Evidence and Clinical Relevance Fails to Dampen Enthusiasm" by Graeme J Sills, PhD, at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1941905/ After my having about 700 dense clusters of seizures, progressively getting worse over the decades, something seems to be begetting something about the seizures of epilepsy, and while a very intense secondarily generalized tonic-clonic (TC) can sometimes bring an individual cluster to a seemingly abrupt end (it often just terminates my individual awareness of continuing additional seizures in the cluster), my seizures seem to have been making my seizures worse (hopefully to be continually stabilized at less than TC levels with Keppra). The lazy neurologist's answer to if a general seizure became a documented simple/complex partial seizure, would probably be that the general seizures weren't primary general seizures all along. They were just secondarily generalized seizures brought on by previously unidentified partial seizures, partial seizures that now have been identified and have now at least briefly stopped spreading beyond being partials. Tadzio P.S.: Here's a perspective involving on what to call each "seizure type" during each stage of the termination of a generalized seizure: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19400875